Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is no longer just a buzzword—it’s the backbone of modern software delivery. Whether you’re launching a startup or running a global enterprise, IaC empowers your team to build, scale, and maintain complex infrastructure with the speed and precision of software engineering. But with so many tools out there, how do you choose the right one for your Azure projects? Therefore, I am discussing Bicep and Terraform as the main tools out there.
If you’re new to IaC, imagine transforming hours of tedious portal clicking into a few lines of code—repeatable, version-controlled, and reviewable. That’s the magic IaC brings to the table. But choosing the right tool can make or break your cloud strategy, affecting everything from team productivity to long-term maintainability.
The Contenders: Bicep vs. Terraform
Bicep is Microsoft’s answer to the complexity of ARM templates: a domain-specific language (DSL) built for Azure, designed for clarity and deep integration. With Bicep, you get all the power of Azure resources, minus the JSON headaches. It feels like “ARM-lite”—concise, readable, and tightly woven into the Azure ecosystem.
Terraform, by HashiCorp, is the industry’s Swiss Army knife for IaC. Its cloud-agnostic approach means you can manage AWS, GCP, Azure, and even on-premises resources with a single tool. Backed by a massive provider ecosystem and a mature module registry, Terraform lets standardize workflows and reuse patterns across any environment.
| Feature | Bicep (Azure-native) | Terraform (Cloud-agnostic) |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud Coverage | Azure only | Multi-cloud, hybrid, on-prem |
| Language | Concise, TypeScript-like DSL | HCL (HashiCorp Configuration) |
| State Management | No state file; Azure-native | Local/remote state file required |
| Modularity | Native modules, growing | Mature module registry |
| Ecosystem | Small, Azure-focused | Large, multi-provider |
| New Azure Features | Immediate support | May lag behind Bicep |
| Security/Policies | Azure Policy, Blueprints | OPA, Sentinel, flexible |
Real-World Scenarios
- Startup building only on Azure: Bicep’s simplicity and Azure-native features mean faster onboarding, less boilerplate, and immediate access to the latest Azure services. Your team can move from idea to deployment in record time.
- Enterprise with AWS, Azure, and on-prem workloads: Terraform’s unified workflow and provider model make it the pragmatic choice for consistent, repeatable deployments everywhere. You can codify infrastructure patterns once and apply them across clouds, reducing duplication and risk.
Developer Experience
Bicep offers a gentle learning curve for Azure-centric teams, with direct integration into Azure tools and pipelines. Its syntax is approachable, and the tight coupling with Azure means fewer surprises and faster feedback.
Terraform is familiar territory for DevOps engineers with experience across cloud platforms. However, managing state files and providers introduces complexity—especially as your infrastructure grows. Still, the flexibility and ecosystem are unmatched.
Actionable Steps to Get Started
You can find a working repository for provisioning an azure function app (v2) using Bicep here in my Github repository.
- Try Bicep:
- Install the Bicep CLI and explore the [Bicep Playground] to see how concise your Azure deployments can be.
- Start with a simple resource, like a storage account, and notice how much boilerplate you avoid compared to ARM templates.
- Experiment with Terraform:
- Download Terraform and initialize a new project targeting Azure.
- Explore the Terraform Registry for reusable modules and see how easy it is to integrate third-party services.
- Mix and Match:
- If your organization is Azure-first but considering multi-cloud in the future, start with Bicep for pure Azure workloads and evaluate Terraform for cross-cloud scenarios.
Comments